Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' Yeah, I think UEFI LoadImage()/StarImage(), which is what you'd call to chain load the UEFI bootloader, are set to validate the loaded image for Secure Boot and not launch it for unsigned/broken images, if Secure Boot is enabled (but I admit I haven't formally validated that). It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. I am getting the same error, and I confirmed that the iso has UEFI support. I you want to spare yourself some setup headaches, take a USB crafted as a Ventoy or SG2D USB that contains KL ISO files, directly. Results when tested on different models\types of x86 computers - amount of RAM, make/model, latest BIOS? The USB partition shows very slow after install Ventoy. they reviewed all the source code). And it's possible that the UEFI specs went as far as specifying that specific aspects of the platform security, such as disk encryption through TPM, should only be available if Secure Boot is enabled. Also ZFS is really good. (The 32 bit images have got the 32 bit UEFI). The point of this issue is that people are under the impression that because Ventoy supports Secure Boot, they will get the same level of "security" booting Secure Boot compliant media through Ventoy as if they had booted that same media directly, which is indeed a fair expectation to have, since the whole point of boot media creation software is to have the converted media behave as close as possible as the original would. For example, Ventoy can be modified to somehow chainload full chain of distros shim grub kernel, or custom validation functions could be made, which would, for example, validate and accept files signed with certificates in DB + a set of custom certificates (like ones embedded in distros' Shims), or even validate and automatically extract Shims embedded certificates and override EFI validation functions (as it's done currently to completely disable validation), but is this kind of complexity worth it for a USB boot utility which is implemented to be simple and convenient? ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi They do not provide a legacy boot option if there is a fat partition with an /EFI folder on it. But, just like GRUB, I assert that this matter needs to be treated as a bug that warrants fixing, which is the reason I created this issue in the first place. Tested on 1.0.57 and 1.0.79. I'm considering two ways for user to select option 1. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. New version of Rescuezilla (2.4) not working properly. So, yeah, if you have access to to the hardware, then Secure Boot, TPM or whatever security measure you currently have on consumer-grade products, is pretty much useless because, as long as you can swap hardware components around, or even touch the hardware (to glitch the RAM for instance), then unless the TPM comes with an X-Ray machine that can scan and compare hardware components, you're going to have a very hard time plugging all the many holes through which a dedicated attacker can gain access to your data. Yep, the Rescuezilla v2.4 thing is not a problem with Ventoy. always used Archive Manager to do this and have never had an issue. This software will repair common computer errors, protect you from file loss, malware, hardware failure and optimize your PC for maximum performance. boots, but kernel panic: did not find boot partitions; opens a debugger. Maybe because of partition type debes desactivar secure boot en el bios-uefi Ventoy also supports BIOS Legacy. So thanks a ton, @steve6375! Seriously? It's the BIOS that decides the boot mode not Ventoy. Now there's no need to format the disk again and again or to extract anything-- with Ventoy simply copy the ISO file to the USB drive and boot it. What you want is for users to be alerted if someone picked a Linux or Microsoft media, and the UEFI bootloader was altered from the original. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Create bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD(x)/EFI files using Ventoy Already on GitHub? https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view, https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file, [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1. Download Debian net installer. If so, please include aflag to stop this check from happening! The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. If a user is booting a lot of unsigned bootloaders with Secure Boot enabled, they clearly should disable Secure Boot in their settings, because, for what they are doing, it is pretty much pointless. Download ventoy-delete-key-1..iso and copy it to the Ventoy USB drive. its existence because of the context of the error message. EDIT: If you use Rufus to write the same ISO file to the same USB stick and boot in your computer. They boot from Ventoy just fine. ISO: GeckoLinux_STATIC_Plasma.x86_64-152.200719..iso (size: 1,316MB) . Extracting the very same efi file and running that in Ventoy did work! You can have BIOS with TPM and disk encryption and, provided your hardware manufacturer implements anti tampering protection to ensure that the TPM is not sharing data it shouldn't share with parts of the system that should not be trusted, it should be no less secure than TPM-based encryption on a Secure Boot enabled system. When you run into problem when booting an image file, please make sure that the file is not corrupted. @pbatard, if that's what what your concern, that could be easily fixed by deleting grubia32.efi and grubx64.efi in /EFI/BOOT, and renaming grubia32_real.efi grubia32.efi, grubx64_real.efi grubx64.efi. I'll try looking into the changelog on the deb package and see if However what currently happens is that people who do have Secure Boot enabled will currently not be alerted to these at all. if you want can you test this too :) Rik. I will not release 1.1.0 until a relatively perfect secure boot solution. Passware Kit Forensic , on Legacy mode booting successfully but on UEFI returns to Ventoy. I used Rufus on a new USB with the same iso image, and when I booted to it with UEFI it booted successfully. What matters is what users perceive and expect. Can you add the exactly iso file size and test environment information? @steve6375 So any method that allows users to boot their media without having to explicitly disable Secure Boot can be seen as a nice thing to have even if it comes at the price of reducing the overall security of one's computer. What exactly is the problem? I tested it but trying to boot it will fail with an I/O error. Thnx again. 2. I didn't add an efi boot file - it already existed; I only referenced If you get some error screen instead of the above blue screen (for example, Linpus lite xxxx). Windows 10 32bit only support IA32 efi, your machine may be x86_64 uefi (amd64 uefi), so this distro can't boot and will show this message. Official FAQ I have checked the official FAQ. Yes, anybody can make a UEFI bootloader that chain loads unsigned bootloaders with the express purpose of defeating Secure Boot. Guiding you with how-to advice, news and tips to upgrade your tech life. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_updated_may_2020_x64_dvd_aa8db2cc.iso Have a question about this project? its okay. relativo a la imagen iso a utilizar BIOS Mode Both Partition Style GPT Disk . The MISO_EFI partition contains only 1 folder called "efi" and another folder in it called "boot" which contains a single file called "bootx64.efi.". All the userspace applications don't need to be signed. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. The error sits 45 cm away from the screen, haha. https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat and leave it up to the user. GRUB mode fixed it! Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. snallinux-.6-x86_64.iso - 1.40 GB Astra Linux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. Please follow the guid bellow. To create a USB stick that is compatible with USB 3.0 using the native boot experience of the Windows 10 Technical Preview media (or Windows 8/Windows 8.1), use DiskPart to format the USB stick and set the partition to active, then copy all of the files from inside the ISO . When it asks Delete the key (s), select Yes. to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. BUT with Ventoy 1.0.74 legacy boot from the same ISO I get a black square in centre of menu (USB LED is flashing so appears to load). This was not considered Secure Boot violation as ExitBootServices() was called prior to booting the kernel. evrything works fine with legacy mode. If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. When secure boot is enabled, only .efi/kernel/drivers need to be signed. access with key cards) making sure that your safe does get installed there, so that it should give you an extra chance to detect ill intentioned people trying to access its content. In Linux, you need to specify the device to install Ventoy which can be a USB drive or local disk. @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . Format Ext4 in Linux: sudo mkfs -t ext4 /dev/sdb1 Also tested on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 16GB OK (UEFI64). Again, the major problem I see with this fine discussion is that everybody appears to be tiptoeing around the fact that some users have no clue what Secure Boot is intended for (only that, because it says "Secure" they don't want to turn it off), and, rather than trying to educate them about that, we're trying to find ways to keep them "feeling safe" when the choices they might make would leave their system anything but.